Microsoft design interview: the whiteboard round

Inclusive design, systems thinking and collaboration — the lens Microsoft interviewers use, and a worked prompt.

Microsoft’s design culture is built around inclusive design: solving for people who are excluded and letting those solutions benefit everyone. Its interviews reflect that. The design exercise rewards designers who consider the full range of human ability and context, think in systems (Microsoft ships enterprise-scale products used by huge, varied populations), and collaborate rather than perform. This page covers the format, what is scored, a realistic prompt, and how to run it.

What the Microsoft design interview looks like

A Microsoft loop typically includes a portfolio review, a design exercise, and collaborative or behavioural rounds. In the design exercise you frame a prompt and sketch a direction while narrating, usually within about 45 minutes. Interviewers are attuned to the inclusive design toolkit — do you consider permanent, temporary, and situational constraints? — and to systems thinking, since much of Microsoft’s work is enterprise software with many roles and long-lived data. Treating the interviewer as a collaborator, not an audience, matches how Microsoft teams actually work.

What Microsoft is really scoring

Inclusive design

Considering excluded users — permanent, temporary, and situational constraints — and designing so the solution benefits everyone. Microsoft’s signature signal.

Systems thinking

Reasoning about roles, permissions, states, and long-lived data — not just one screen. Enterprise products live and die on this.

Collaboration

Working with the interviewer, inviting input, building on redirects. Microsoft prizes designers who make teams better.

Clear structure

A followable path from problem to direction, narrated throughout.

A realistic Microsoft prompt

“Design a way for a mixed-ability team to run an effective meeting together remotely”

A collaboration prompt in Microsoft’s enterprise world that foregrounds inclusion — participants with different hearing, vision, language, and connectivity — and rewards systems thinking about roles and states.

0–5

Clarify & scope. Which team, which meeting type, what mix of abilities and contexts? Constrain out loud and note who is in the room.

5–12

Name the excluded user. Pick a participant the default experience fails — say, someone who is hard of hearing on a poor connection — and center them.

12–22

Map roles & moments. Break the meeting into moments (join, contribute, follow along, recap) across roles (host, presenter, participant). Mark where inclusion breaks.

22–34

Direction that generalises. Sketch a direction that fixes the excluded user’s moment and improves it for everyone — the inclusive-design payoff.

34–45

Systems & measure. Cover states and edge cases (dropouts, latecomers) and say how you would measure inclusive participation.

narrate every beat — silence isn’t scored ✦

Common mistakes in the Microsoft interview

Accessibility as an afterthought. Bolting on captions at the end. Microsoft wants inclusion driving the design from the first minute.

Single-screen thinking. Ignoring roles, permissions, and states. Enterprise problems are systems — show you see them.

Performing, not collaborating. Talking at the interviewer. Invite input and build on their nudges.

Generic “everyone” inclusion. Claiming it works for all without naming a specific excluded user and designing for them.

How to prepare for Microsoft

Build the inclusive-design habit until it is automatic: for every prompt, name a specific excluded user before you sketch. Run timed reps with the timer, score them on the rubric, and deliberately practise systems-heavy, multi-role prompts from the challenge library. Our clarifying-questions guide helps you surface the ability and context constraints Microsoft cares about early.

Practise a Microsoft-style challenge →

Common questions

What is inclusive design in a Microsoft interview?

Designing for people excluded by the default experience — considering permanent, temporary, and situational constraints — so the result benefits everyone. Naming a specific excluded user and designing for them is a strong signal.

How long is the Microsoft design exercise?

The whiteboard design exercise is typically around 45 minutes, including setup and questions. Rehearse against a 45-minute clock.

Is the Microsoft interview collaborative?

Yes — interviewers often act as collaborators. Inviting input and building on their redirects matches how Microsoft design teams work and reads well.

Other companies